Skip to main content

First Principles

Yesterday, I was having lunch with a Savio alum who keeps me updated on what's going on in her life. In the course of our discussion, it was brought up how strange it is that people who are rational human beings can have such completely opposite ideas when it comes to politics.
It's great when students still want to see you.


While a portion of the explanation can certainly come down to training in formal logic (which we don't do anymore in school), I think a bigger part is found in first principles. First principles are those founding ideas that we build our arguments and decisions upon. (There are other definitions, but this is what I'm sticking with today.) In order to enter into any rational discourse, a person should know where they stand on the fundamentals. I would suggest that the irrationality present in many of our political discussions today is due to the fact that we don't examine these deeply held beliefs. The argument is started higher up the chain and beliefs are often based on the personality of a specific person.


Here's a list of things that I think it is important to know (or at least have an idea of) in today's society. There may be more than one right answer, your answer might even ultimately be "wrong", but you should be clear on what you think the answer is.

  • What is the purpose of life?
  • Can I change who I fundamentally am?
  • What is the role of God (if any) in my life?
  • What is the moral responsibility (if any) of those who "have" to those who "have not"?
  • What is the purpose of work?
  • What is the purpose of obtaining wealth?
  • What is the function of government?
  • What is the purpose of the criminal justice system?
  • What is the goal of technology?
  • What is societal progress?
  • How do we know that we have achieved it?
  • What is success?
  • Does my definition of success apply for everyone in the world?
  • At what point (if ever) do the ends justify the means?
  • Is society strengthened more by conformity or diversity?
There's a lot more that I cannot think of right now, but everyone should know where they stand on at least these before entering into any debate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Issues with Harry Potter: Part 4 - The Education System

Okay, maybe it's because I'm not British, but the education system in the Wizarding world makes very little sense to me (a teacher). Granted, the American system doesn't make sense to much of the rest of the world. Here in the US, we don't have college entrance exams, so I won't criticize things like OWLs or NEWTs. However, I am going to have to criticize the entire theory of education. Primary Schooling A Hogwarts letter arrives on a student's 11th birthday (sort of). What are the options for students before they are 11? Rowling says that they may either go to public schools or they are home schooled. It sure seems like most magical parents choose the latter option (most wizards know nothing of the Muggle world, which should not be the case if they attended public school for 6 years). Here we run into our first problem. What exactly are these children being taught? In the US (and from what I can tell, the UK), parents are not required to fol...

Don't Take Candy from Babies

 It's been 8 years since my last Halloween post , so I guess it's time to update my complaint. To sum up: trick-or-treating is for children. If you're not a child, buy your own candy. To be clear, I'm not anti-fun and I'm not anti costume. Case in point: What I am against is co-opting something that is meant for children and taking it for adults/teens (Disney adults is a gray area. It's okay to like Disney, but taking up all the space in the lines at the parks is rude). For the record, I am also against: Adults sitting in costumed Santa laps Adult Easter egg hunts Adults playing on playgrounds during the day while children wait for their turn on the swings with tears in their eyes (most of these scenarios involve crying children in my imagination). I think Halloween is a great time for celebration. It's the nature of the celebrations that change. For my 40th birthday, did I rent a bounce house? No, I rented a movie theater and we watched Stardust. Is Christm...

Gentlemen and Ladies

So, I was listening to the announcements at the end of the school day yesterday. It mentioned something about the Lady Eagles volleyball team playing the Panthers (or some such team). Why does it need to be the "Lady Eagles"? The volleyball team is exclusively women. We don't say the "Gentleman Eagles" football team. We say Savio baseball, not Savio Boy's baseball. A gentleman eagle I can see some cases where a distinction might need to be drawn between teams (soccer, swimming, track, etc). However, we should then use both modifiers (Gentlemen and Ladies). I know that the problem is bigger than just Savio. It often bothered me while I was at UT as well. Many of my students accuse me of overthinking things like this. I think that as a society, we don't consider them enough. What is the micro-message of this disparity? That male sports are "normal"? That you need to be warned that you're going to see women play sports? This is symptom...