Skip to main content

Watch the 1995 Pride and Prejudice (not the 2005 version)

Our sophomores read Pride and Prejudice, which is a book that everyone should read (it actually gets better each time I read it. I pick up on the humor more and more each time).

You may wonder (when you're done reading of course), which movie should you watch: the 1995 adaptation or the 2005 (there are a number of other options including 1940, 1980, and Pride, Prejudice, and Zombies, but we'll put those aside for now). In my mind, there's only one viable option. It's the 1995 BBC miniseries version. It's just better all around. 


If you haven't seen it, you may never agree with me (we tend to like the first thing that we see). However, here are a few reasons whey you should give it a chance:


The casting (and hair) is much better. Here are 3 examples.

1995: Colin Firth

2005: Matthew Macfadyen





1995:  Jennifer Ehle
2005: Kiera Knightley





1995: Mr. Bennet (Benjamin Whitrow)
2005: Mr. Bennet (Donald Sutherland)



Length is important in book adaptations.


To properly adapt a book, you need time. the 2005 film has a runtime of 2 hrs and 7 minutes. That's just not long enough to properly focus on the details, characters, and subplots. In other words, the 2005 film reduces the story down to the bare bones of the story and a whole lot of Wickham being a jerk is left out.

The 1995 miniseries runs on for 5 hrs and 25 minutes. Now, you may say that is too long, but if you have the patience to read a book, you should be able to sit through a movie as well. That extra time gives room to explore the characters and their motivations, faithfully reproduce the best lines, and focus on reactions (not to mention lots of time for Darcy to stare).
It would be a lot shorter without the staring.

Another important aspect of the length is that Pride and Prejudice is like comfort food. I (and by extension you should) watch/read it when I'm not feeling well. If I'm going to be in bed sick all day, 2 hours isn't going to be enough to get me through.


The hand flex is stupid

Much has been said of Darcy's hand flex.


Big deal. I flex my hand all the time: when I'm cold, when I'm trying burn a few extra calories, when I'm stressed, sometimes when I'm feeling awkward. But never when I'm concealing passion. This means nothing.



Please take a weekend on watch the vastly superior 1995 version.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Issues with Harry Potter: Part 4 - The Education System

Okay, maybe it's because I'm not British, but the education system in the Wizarding world makes very little sense to me (a teacher). Granted, the American system doesn't make sense to much of the rest of the world. Here in the US, we don't have college entrance exams, so I won't criticize things like OWLs or NEWTs. However, I am going to have to criticize the entire theory of education. Primary Schooling A Hogwarts letter arrives on a student's 11th birthday (sort of). What are the options for students before they are 11? Rowling says that they may either go to public schools or they are home schooled. It sure seems like most magical parents choose the latter option (most wizards know nothing of the Muggle world, which should not be the case if they attended public school for 6 years). Here we run into our first problem. What exactly are these children being taught? In the US (and from what I can tell, the UK), parents are not required to fol...
Post a Comment
Read more

Don't Take Candy from Babies

 It's been 8 years since my last Halloween post , so I guess it's time to update my complaint. To sum up: trick-or-treating is for children. If you're not a child, buy your own candy. To be clear, I'm not anti-fun and I'm not anti costume. Case in point: What I am against is co-opting something that is meant for children and taking it for adults/teens (Disney adults is a gray area. It's okay to like Disney, but taking up all the space in the lines at the parks is rude). For the record, I am also against: Adults sitting in costumed Santa laps Adult Easter egg hunts Adults playing on playgrounds during the day while children wait for their turn on the swings with tears in their eyes (most of these scenarios involve crying children in my imagination). I think Halloween is a great time for celebration. It's the nature of the celebrations that change. For my 40th birthday, did I rent a bounce house? No, I rented a movie theater and we watched Stardust. Is Christm...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gentlemen and Ladies

So, I was listening to the announcements at the end of the school day yesterday. It mentioned something about the Lady Eagles volleyball team playing the Panthers (or some such team). Why does it need to be the "Lady Eagles"? The volleyball team is exclusively women. We don't say the "Gentleman Eagles" football team. We say Savio baseball, not Savio Boy's baseball. A gentleman eagle I can see some cases where a distinction might need to be drawn between teams (soccer, swimming, track, etc). However, we should then use both modifiers (Gentlemen and Ladies). I know that the problem is bigger than just Savio. It often bothered me while I was at UT as well. Many of my students accuse me of overthinking things like this. I think that as a society, we don't consider them enough. What is the micro-message of this disparity? That male sports are "normal"? That you need to be warned that you're going to see women play sports? This is symptom...
Post a Comment
Read more